so, furry x animal and that's somehow not bestiality?

aight sure lol, either way its great~

Base +7, Hilarity +5, raichupal -8, AlanB +7, rt2hot +7, lostlegoman +8, Kurty217 +5, casurin +7, oneiwonder +5, Christy Kee +6

I give props to the uploader for the gutsy comment alone, lol.

Base +7, totaldefence +6, AlanB +7, raichupal +8, Kurty217 +5, casurin +7, narfen +6

Bestiality doesn't get expunged to begin with.

Base +16, raichupal -8, jolls6577 +10, Kurty217 +5, casurin +7, oneiwonder +5, Nyax1 +4, narfen +6

It isn't really bestiality if the animal in question shows a real human range of emotion. In furry terms its apparently called "feral" and people have whole characters that are "feral" furries. Not sure why it isnt bestiality, just know it isn. It's fiction, so what does it matter anyway?

Base +6, raichupal +8, wololf500 +5, Kurty217 +5, RatchetSly -6, casurin +7, linksbro1 +6, trex3000 +6, Christy Kee -6, narfen +6

This comic raises so many questions...

Base +5, Kurty217 -5, 3dd +7, casurin +7

Not bestiality eh? Yeah that's kinda a load of shit.

Base +2, rippy77 -6, russell357 -10, Kurty217 -5, RatchetSly +6, casurin -7, trex3000 +6, stbash -7, Christy Kee +6, narfen -6

@ IronBanshee
>Not bestiality eh? Yeah that's kinda a load of shit.
A mare with a human like body and a normal horse...still a horse and a mare....go sit in the corner!

Base +7, trex3000 +6, Christy Kee -6

@ hoks
Either way it was hot to me, but this would technically be Beasteality. At least if you look at it from an evolution standpoint anyway. The Mare is clearly farther along the evolutionary chain then the stallion, and while this is not quite the same as a human having sex with a horse, it's more like a human having sex with a monkey, which would still be considered beasteality if you get my meaning. Of course it's still a matter of personal opinion though.

Base +1, Christy Kee +6