https://www.pixiv.net/en/artworks/74759182

part 1:http://e-hentai.fbk.tokyo/index/g/2185733/3f55541873/
part 2:http://e-hentai.fbk.tokyo/index/g/2185796/89872f2ff0/
part 3:http://e-hentai.fbk.tokyo/index/g/2187333/0f15b591b6/ (you are here)
part 4:http://e-hentai.fbk.tokyo/index/g/2200893/a16d536320/

"Non-H
Drawn content that is NOT pornographic in nature"

Idk man, there's certain fetishizing aspect about this artist, I wouldn't call it not pornographic IN NATURE (this specially applies to part 1 and 2). Also it did many other nsfw galleries but that's not 100% ontopic

Base +9

@DarkMel Yeah I agree but it's a bit of an edge-case. If the argument of being clearly fetishized despite no sex or nudity can be made I usually just upload it without non-h category/tag or Nudity Only/No Penetration and let others decide which of the two directions to push the gallery in (in this case it was tagged as Non-Nude which would have been most appropriate if it was't for non-nude being exclusive to the Cosplay category......and people just reclassed it to non-h instead when I requested downvotes on the incorrect tag) If want to debate where to draw the line and/or request support in tagging/reclassing best to take it to the forum

Last edited on 16 April 2022, 19:02.

Base +14