>Female: urethra insertion
>goes into a fucking dick
can people stop this shit?

Base +6, longdongfooey -5, caveman84 -6, Chaos147 -2, Angel_Stitch +6, Aisk1000 -7, stone55 -6, seibaru -8, tier22 -7, kaneqc +6, codepdxlan -7, efb +6, axaxax +13

<Krowler> Annoying as fuck when searching for the good stuff, but done correctly according to the site's tag definitions. Another annoying thing is the swathe of different terms describing "women" with cocks, that avoid filters(not trying to get into the whole "how much dick is gay?" or "are you a boy or a girl?" -debate, as that turns always into a clusterfuck without fail). I was at a point on the cusp of creating a petition/thread about making genital specific urethral insertion tag, as well as an umbrella term for apparent females with stereotypically masculine sex organs attached to them. But even that discussion would probably contain too much skub to get any improvements realized.

Base +6

@homoteus, wasnt there a futanari tag when you looked into this gallery?

Base +2

@xrail91 Not always, by a longshot. Quite often there is some inventive alternate tag, of which you can't really keep track of anymore(with futanari being the most common, thankfully). Also, the admissions under traps and shemales etc. should go under male, yes? That happens the other way around more often than not. But that gender division in tags has been a godsend, no other way around it.

Base +6

It's kinda weird to not expect urethra insertion to be together with futanari most of the time. I just did a search and Urethra insertion alone - 3595, and with futanari - 1920. Which mean that for more than half of the time there is a dick involved. But I agree that there should be difference with futanari ans shemale tags. You can't be sure with things you can't see. Maybe it's a futanari, who knows. But from outer appearence it's clearly a shemale.

Base +7

@Zellos why is it clearly a shemale ? there are also futanari with balls.

Base +2